设为首页收藏本站

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

楼主: Alex2011
打印 上一主题 下一主题

11-12 ZM专贴(拜仁1-1蓝军:客队赢得点球大战)

[复制链接]
726#
发表于 2012-2-6 14:52:35 | 只看该作者
对于非洲杯,大家似乎木有关注的

不过719楼有一篇zm分析,是关于科特迪瓦1/4赛的
Alex2011 发表于 2012-2-6 14:49


这届非洲杯本来强队的不多,关注点比较少

我希望科特迪瓦能打进决赛!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

727#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-6 14:53:06 | 只看该作者
本赛季英超红蓝大战两场,

第一场红魔3-1大胜蓝军,托雷斯空门“神奇”不进

第二场蓝军3-3汗平,曾经3球领先,到被追3球,博阿斯还是英雄气短的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

728#
发表于 2012-2-6 14:56:54 | 只看该作者
对非洲杯实在提不起什么性质,一群黑兄弟谁谁谁都分不清楚。

717楼蛮有意思,西瓜典型的D型,野兽C型,梅西和KUN勉强E型,帕斯托雷和阿尔瓦雷斯都是A型 ...
午时靡深蓝 发表于 2012-2-6 14:51


我发现PES 2012里面西瓜也很好用,射门精度比野兽和KUN都高,野兽有时候也挺好,KUN的优势不明显啊
这样反倒有些纠结了

两个影锋则毫无悬念,梅西+拉维奇!!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

729#
发表于 2012-2-6 14:59:10 | 只看该作者
对非洲杯实在提不起什么性质,一群黑兄弟谁谁谁都分不清楚。

717楼蛮有意思,西瓜典型的D型,野兽C型,梅西和KUN勉强E型,帕斯托雷和阿尔瓦雷斯都是A型 ...
午时靡深蓝 发表于 2012-2-6 14:51


蒂姆-卡希尔才能说是真正的E型,梅西和KUN差远了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

730#
发表于 2012-2-6 15:01:14 | 只看该作者
西瓜的确好用,跑位好射术佳,盘带只用他变向过门将那一下,就是头球挫了点
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

731#
发表于 2012-2-6 15:04:20 | 只看该作者
我现在研究出了小角度任意球破门大法
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

732#
发表于 2012-2-6 15:08:36 | 只看该作者
西瓜的确好用,跑位好射术佳,盘带只用他变向过门将那一下,就是头球挫了点
午时靡深蓝 发表于 2012-2-6 15:01


有时打起来觉得阿昆的跑位就没有西瓜来的好,别扭,但是阿昆的速度和控带都更强

不过游戏里应该没有对跑位作一个明显数值,FM里面是有的

说到头球,整个锋线都挫,无压力


PS:Garay真的还可以,算比较好用了,腿长;蒂诺-科斯塔较为一般,右中前卫找不到合适人选,我可能考虑老贝隆
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

733#
发表于 2012-2-6 15:09:47 | 只看该作者
我现在研究出了小角度任意球破门大法
午时靡深蓝 发表于 2012-2-6 15:04


我估计人人对战不一定好用
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

734#
发表于 2012-2-6 15:15:06 | 只看该作者
已投入实战,把我弟打的目瞪口呆
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

735#
发表于 2012-2-6 16:52:30 | 只看该作者
[quote]目前正在激战的非洲国家杯似乎没什么人关注

今年的赛事自农历小年夜开战至今,已进行到半决赛阶段


弱队已经悉数被剿灭,目前半决赛对阵形势为:

赞比亚 VS 加纳

马里 VS 科特迪瓦


效力于河南建业的赞比亚前锋 ...
北极海 发表于 2012-2-6 14:45 [/quot

那个啥,为什么切尔西的埃辛没有被征召呢?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

736#
发表于 2012-2-6 20:49:36 | 只看该作者
目前正在激战的非洲国家杯似乎没什么人关注

今年的赛事自农历小年夜开战至今,已进行到半决赛阶段


弱队已经悉数被剿灭,目前半决赛对阵形势为:

赞比亚 VS 加纳

马里 VS 科特迪瓦


效力于河南建业的赞比亚前锋 ...
小豆丁梅西 发表于 2012-2-6 16:52
埃辛是加纳的水牛吧   之前受伤了  恢复前名单已递交上去了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

737#
发表于 2012-2-7 10:52:12 | 只看该作者
埃辛应该向图雷兄弟学习,为了参加国家队整风大会,连曼彻斯特德比也可以不参加

国家荣誉高于一切!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

738#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-7 17:03:39 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-2-7 17:06 编辑

Six points on Ghana 2-1 Tunisia
February 6, 2012



The starting line-ups

1. Ghana replicated the Ivory Coast’s tendency to rely on opposition mistakes and set-pieces to get their goals.

Forcing errors in the opposition is a large part of attacking, and dead ball situations make up a high percentage of goals at any level of football. But the dependency on those two avenues is a damning indictment of the lack of creativity in the two sides considered to the best in the tournament. A final between the two is probable, but it could turn into a defensive stand-off.

2. Tunisia started with a 4-3-1-2 formation, but more like the interpretation of the system favoured by Santos, the reigning Copa Libertadores champions, rather than the static system favoured by a few Serie A clubs.

The key is the defensive responsibilities of the forwards – both Zouheir Dhaoudi and Saber Khelifa dropped to wide positions without the ball, sometimes forming a 4-5-1 with Youssef M’Sakni as the highest player up the pitch, then sometimes dropping into more of a 4-4-2ish shape, with one forward dropping back and the other remaining up top.

3. Tunisia also showed flexibility at the back, with the holding midfielder Hocine Ragued dropping between the centre-backs to allow it easy for Tunisia to play the ball out. Ragued’s willingness to come deep to collect the ball meant he was able to play more passes than any other player.

4. It was odd that Sami Trabelsi decided to change the way Tunisia played midway through the first half. M’Sakni went from the centre to the right, Khelifa from the left to the right, and Dhaoudi from the right to the left. It disturbed the rhythm of the side after a decent opening, and Tunisia went on to have only two shots on target in 120 minutes, a terrible record considering they marginally dominated possession.

5. Bizarrely, the player on either side that completed the most passes into the opposition third of the pitch was the holding player – Ragued and Anthony Annan. It demonstrated how difficult the sides found to play the ball forward and involve attackers in the build-up play.



6. The majority of the game was simply a struggle to find any players in space in attacking zones. Both defended with numbers and matched each other in midfield. With the Tunisia forwards moving out to close down the Ghana full-backs, they didn’t get much freedom on the ball either.

In theory the Tunisia full-backs were afforded more time on the ball, but the technically better Khalil Chammam had to watch Andre Ayew (though he still did get forward a bit), while right-back Bilel Ifa was less comfortable on the ball.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

739#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-7 17:03:59 | 只看该作者
738楼参考译文
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

740#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-7 17:07:47 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-2-7 17:13 编辑

Liverpool 0-0 Tottenham: neither side step it up in the second half
February 6, 2012


The starting line-ups

A decent game but no goals.

Kenny Dalglish had Luis Suarez available again but kept him on the bench. Jose Enrique missed his first game of the season, so Glen Johnson moved to the left with Martin Kelly at right-back.

Harry Redknapp was absent from the match. Tottenham had various injury problems so went for a conservative 4-5-1 shape, with Jake Livermore in the centre and Niko Kranjcar out wide.

Midfield battle

This was more like the kind of game we usually get between two ‘big’ sides – a little bit cagey, slow to get going, and both sides working each other out in the opening moments. In the first half there was very little to speak about in the wide areas – all the interest was in the centre.

The sides were set out differently. At the start Liverpool were more 4-2-3-1 than 4-3-3, with Steven Gerrard high up and connecting with Andy Carroll, with the two other players sitting deeper, albeit with Adam having a little more license to get forward.

The Tottenham midfield triangle was structured the opposite way, with Parker at the bottom the clear holding player, and Luka Modric and Livermore moving further up. This meant the two triangles largely matched each other.

Highest midfielders move deeper

There were some exceptions to that. Gerrard, for example, dropped off without the ball and didn’t pressure Parker, so he had time on the ball to play safe passes. This rather negated the point of Liverpool’s early closing down, with Dirk Kuyt, Andy Carroll and Craig Bellamy all working hard to put pressure on the Spurs defence. Parker was an easy out-ball.

Similarly, Luka Modric started quite high up but became much deeper. Jay Spearing had time to pick a pass, though his more ambitious balls were often wayward. He also lacks the positional sense of Lucas Leiva when a teammate has possession – he stands still when there is an opponent in between himself and the player with the ball, meaning a pass is impossible. The Liverpool way is ‘pass and move’, but sometimes you need to ‘move and pass’.

Modric showed him how to do it, with another exceptional display of precise passing.



Movement

As the game went on, Gerrard started to drift around, dragging Parker out of position. Parker was excellent late on, but earlier committed needless fouls and was often too far ahead of the defence – Liverpool could have been cleverer in getting a player between the lines once Parker had been tempted up the pitch by Gerrard, but neither wide player came inside and Adam lacked the mobility and pace to storm forward.

Indeed, it was Tottenham’s midfield trio that tilted more effectively towards the end of the first half, leading to a couple of good spells of possession. They were much more patient than usual on the ball, probably owing to the different system.

The only interesting battle on the wing was Kyle Walker v Bellamy – Walker forced Bellamy back into deep positions, but Bellamy did a good defensive job (on both Walker and others) and Johnson had a good game at left-back.



Carroll v Adebayor

After two assists in two weeks, Andy Carroll looked confident here. He won balls in the air, his movement was good, his hold-up ability helped link play. He was considerably better than Emmanuel Adebayor, who will argue that he was isolated with few runners from central midfield, but his hold-up play was particularly poor, he didn’t move into good positions, and was rarely a goal threat.

There were few goalmouth incidents in the first half, but it was actually a decent game – finely-balanced, good passing in midfield, but no real threat upfront. Half time was about how the two managers could change that.

Changes

The problem was that neither manager (or Tottenham’s coaches, rather) changed things straight away, with the exception of Bale and Kranjcar swapping flanks for a period in the second half. Dalglish left things for too long, and unless Suarez had any fitness concerns after his long break, it’s difficult to see why he didn’t replace Kuyt earlier. The Dutchman wasn’t really contributing anything – he didn’t move inside into the position he scored against Manchester United from, and instead stayed wide but rarely tried to take on Benoit Assou-Ekotto.

When Suarez did finally arrive, for Kuyt, it meant Gerrard going to the right and Suarez going upfront. Parker now had no-one to mark and moved deeper role where he excelled, chasing back to make last-ditch tackles and getting into good positions to clear. It might have been nice to see Suarez on in Kuyt’s role, with Gerrard still in the middle. Then, Gerrard could have taken Parker away from that zone, with Suarez coming inside from the flank as the ’second number ten’, a little like how Mesut Ozil played well at the Nou Camp recently with Kaka occupying Sergio Busquets. That isn’t Suarez’s natural role, of course, but that seemed to the area Tottenham were vulnerable in, and he is adaptable enough to play there.

Tottenham’s change was like-for-like – Louis Saha on for Adebayor. They had the clearest chance of the game when Kranjcar played in Bale over the top with the Liverpool defence a little too high up the pitch, but Bale’s shot was poor, and 0-0 probably reflected the balance of play.

Conclusion

With the sides matching each other in midfield, the key to gaining the upper hand was always going to be about changing the game from the bench. Tottenham barely changed things at all, while Liverpool brought on Suarez, but probably too late, and possibly not in the right role. Carroll played well but finished poorly, while Adebayor and Saha were barely involved. Neither side did enough to score.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

741#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-7 17:08:12 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-2-25 20:07 编辑

740楼参考译文

----------------------

2012-02-08 / 余文乐


The starting line-ups

这是一场不错的比赛,可惜没有进球。

达格利什说苏亚雷斯可以复出了,但是他依然出现在替补席上。恩里克本赛季第一次缺席比赛,格伦约翰逊出现在左路,而马丁凯利出现在右路。

老雷缺席比赛。热刺伤病也很多,所以他们排出了一个451的阵型,利弗莫尔在中间,而克拉尼察出现在边路。

中场争夺

这很像那种我们经常看到的“大战”:大家都有点小心翼翼,然后慢慢开始发力,而双方也在运动战中互相压制。在上半场,两个边路没什么好说的,有趣的地方都在中路。

在开始的时候,利物浦更像是4231而不是433,杰拉德前压接应卡罗尔,另外两名球员站位较深,只有查理亚当偶尔插上助攻。
热刺的中场排列则不一样,帕克是明显的拖后后腰,而莫德里奇和利弗莫尔顶在前面。这意味着两个三角形正好互相对应。
顶在最前的中场回撤。

有些事情更不寻常。例如杰拉德没有球的时候会回撤而不会压迫帕克。这似乎是和利物浦早段的压迫战术背道而驰,因为库伊特、卡罗尔和贝拉米都努力压迫热刺的后防。而帕克是一个明显的接应点。

类似的,莫德里奇开始的时候压得很前,但随后就开始回撤。斯皮林开始有时间去接应传球,尽管他的冒险传球经常不到点。在队友拿球的时候,他没有卢卡斯那样的位置感。当对手站在他和持球队友中间是,他只是静静地站在哪里,这意味着没有传球线路了。利物浦的传统是“pass &move(传球和移动)”但有时候你需要“move&pass(移动和传球)”

莫德里奇向他展示是应该怎么移动,当然展示了精确的传球。



移动

随着比赛的继续进行,杰拉德开始到处移动,把帕克带离防守位置。帕克最近的表现很不错,但早早犯下一些无谓的犯规,并且离防线太远了。利物浦本可以聪明一点,一旦帕克被杰拉德带出来了,就让一个球员利用他和防线之间的空间。但边锋没有内切,查理亚当的移动能力和速度也不足以马上前压。

的确,在半场之前,热刺的中场三人组更有效,在比赛中有过几段精彩的连续控球。他们在保持控球上,他们比平常更加耐心,也许这和他们换了阵型有关。

在边路唯一有趣的对抗是沃克vs贝拉米,沃克迫使贝拉米后退到较深的位置,但贝拉米防守得很好(不过是对手是沃克还是别人,都是如此),而约翰逊在左后卫上表现也不错。


卡罗尔vs阿德巴约

在连续两周贡献助攻之后,卡罗尔今天看起来很自信。他在空中赢下球权,他的移动不错,他的背身拿球能力有利于球队的联系。他被认为表现比阿德巴约更好,后者今天被孤立了,中前卫的跟进很少,但他的背身拿球特别差,他没有移动到好的位置,几乎完全没有进球威胁。

在上半场很少有进球机会,但事实上,那是一场很好的比赛。相当均衡,在中场有出色的传递,但在前场没有真正的威胁。半场休息就是两个主帅作出改变的时候了。

变化

问题是两个主帅(也许热刺说教练更准确)都没有作出明显的改变,只有克拉尼察和贝尔在下半场的一段时间内换了边。达格利什的动作有点太慢了,除非苏亚雷斯的健康有点疑问,否则很难理解为什么不早点用他换下库伊特。荷兰人并没有真正有什么贡献,他没有内切到他在对阵曼联时打进一球的位置,而是留在边路,但是也没有尝试突破埃克托。

当苏亚雷斯最终上场,换下库伊特的时候,这意味着杰拉德移到右边,而苏亚雷斯顶在最前面。帕克现在无人可盯,后撤到更深的位置。他会回追,然后作出最后时刻的铲断,也会出现在关键的位置解围。如果苏亚雷斯出现在库伊特的位置,而杰拉德依然在中路也许会不错。那样的话,杰拉德还可以带走帕克,苏亚雷斯内切当第二个“10号”,有点想最近厄齐尔在诺坎普和卡卡并肩挑战布斯克茨一样。当然,那不是苏亚雷斯最适合的位置,但那里似乎是热刺的真空地带,他也有足够的能力出现在那个位置。

热刺的换人是点对点的换人——萨哈换下阿德巴约。他们有一个全场最好的机会,克拉尼察直塞,利物浦站位有点靠前,贝尔反越位成功。但贝尔射门不佳,而0-0也许反映了场上的均衡局势。

结论

两队在中场互相对位,占得上风的关键总是利用好换人来改变局势。热刺几乎什么都没有改变而利物浦换上了苏亚雷斯,但也许太迟了,而且也不在正确的位置。卡罗尔表现出色,但临门一脚不佳,而阿德巴约和萨哈几乎从没有进入比赛的节奏。两边都没有做出足够的努力去获得进球。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

742#
发表于 2012-2-7 17:10:20 | 只看该作者
埃辛应该向图雷兄弟学习,为了参加国家队整风大会,连曼彻斯特德比也可以不参加

国家荣誉高于一切!
北极海 发表于 2012-2-7 10:52




不过我看了红蓝大战后,大失所望, 此水牛早已非当年的那个无敌铁牛, 状态差的惊人。


还有冰人切赫,也和当年巅峰期差距不小。


车仔赖以成名的中轴暴力线,除了德罗巴余威犹存外,埃辛,切赫早已不复当年勇,兰帕德,特里也是油灯枯竭,


再不大换血,将无力逐鹿中原。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

743#
发表于 2012-2-7 17:13:13 | 只看该作者
不过我看了红蓝大战后,大失所望, 此水牛早已非当年的那个无敌铁牛, 状态差的惊人。


还有冰人切赫,也和当年巅峰期差距不小。


车仔赖以成名的中轴暴力线,除了德罗巴余威犹存外,埃辛,切赫早已不复当年勇 ...
小豆丁梅西 发表于 2012-2-7 17:10


现在正是曼城崛起的最好时机~~~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

744#
发表于 2012-2-9 12:24:23 | 只看该作者
赞比亚的实力很强啊,半决赛1-0力克世界杯八强加纳,晋级决赛

科特迪瓦以相同的比分战胜马里


科特迪瓦的配置颇为豪华,4231阵型最前端四人组全部来自英超豪门

热尔维尼奥 + 亚亚-图雷 + 卡卢,顶端是魔兽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

745#
发表于 2012-2-9 15:38:31 | 只看该作者
赞比亚的实力很强啊,半决赛1-0力克世界杯八强加纳,晋级决赛

科特迪瓦以相同的比分战胜马里


科特迪瓦的配置颇为豪华,4231阵型最前端四人组全部来自英超豪门

热尔维尼奥 + 亚亚-图雷 + 卡卢,顶端是魔兽 ...
北极海 发表于 2012-2-9 12:24


这几位都是英超狠角色

枪手的、曼城的、蓝军的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

746#
发表于 2012-2-9 15:42:07 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 pedro 于 2012-2-9 15:45 编辑

Zambia 1-0 Ghana: Ghana fail to break down deep opposition and Zambia subs win it
February 8, 2012


The line-ups for much of the first half (the Zambian wide players started on opposite flanks to this, but switched early on)

Emmanuel Mayuka came off the bench to score an excellent goal, and Zambia are in the final.

Zambia coach Herve Renard made a couple of surprising moves, dropping Mayuka to bring James Chamanga in the side upfront. He also went more defensive in midfield, meaning no place for the tricky Chisamba Lungu, and Isaac Chanca pushed out wide.

Ghana coach Goran Stefanovic was without Emmanuel Agyemang-Badu, so Derek Boateng started in the centre of midfield. Sulley Muntari was only on the bench, with Kwadwo Asamoah and the Ayew brothers supporting Asamoah Gyan.

Ghana dominate the ball

The game started at a slightly quicker tempo than in many matches in this tournament so far. Ghana, as expected, dominated possession throughout the game, finishing with just over 60% of the ball. Their task was to try to break down a resilient Zambia defence, who were supported well by two very defensive-minded holding players.

That said, sometimes the Sinkala-Kasonde duo got drawn too high up the pitch towards the Ghana holders, Anthony Annan and Boateng. This meant a little bit of space opened up for Asamoah between the lines, and he was probably the main Ghana threat when Zambia got men behind the ball. He had a good chance before half time that was deflected just wide, and also won the penalty that Gyan missed.

Zambia start cautiously

Zambia lined up in a 4-2-2-2ish system that meant they got two banks of four behind the ball, and then attempted to break quickly with the two wide players coming in off the flanks. In fact, the wingers actually swapped around after roughly 15 minutes, with Chansa on the left and Rainford Kabala, their most dangerous player on the ball, on the right. Kabala drove forward with the ball into the centre of the pitch and sometimes further across to the left to combine with Chansa, and attempted a couple of through balls.

But Zambia were struggling to get a grip of the game in midfield, and their main threat came from a couple of cleverly-worked corners.

Inkoom forward

Ghana then started playing some good combinations down their right. Andre Ayew would come inside into the centre of the pitch, allowing rampaging right-back Samuel Inkoom down on the overlap. His crossing was often poor, but he stretched the play well and took advantage of the fact Zambia’s wingers were often out of position at transitions from attack to defence. In fact, the reason Renard switched his wingers may have been because Chansa is the more defensively aware player, and could therefore track Inkoom.

Ghana didn’t replicate the threat from full-back on the other side – Lee Addy remained extremely deep and didn’t help Ghana switch the play. Everything went down the centre – the two brothers came inside and made everything too predictable, and Ghana had their usual problem: they lack creativity to break sides down when they can’t play on the break.



Zambia substitutions

The game was largely decided by substitutions, and the fact that Zambia turned to the bench for quickly shouldn’t be overlooked. In fairness to Stefanovic, his three substitutions seemed to be for injuries, with John Mensah clearly struggling, Gyan not 100% and Ayew going down injured before being withdrawn.


Zambia brought on Mayuka and Lungu for Chamanga and Kasonde

Nevertheless, Renard got his changes right – he moved back to the XI he’d used in the 3-0 quarter-final win over Sudan. Mayuka replaced Chamanga up top and offered more of an attacking threat – he had more pace, so could receive passes over the top of the Ghana defence, and picked up the ball closer to goal than Chamanga did.

The other change saw the holder Kasonde removed, with Sinkala becoming the sole holding player, and Chansa moved to the centre to drive forward from there. The man coming on was Chisamba Lungu, who ran at the Ghana defence and gave the ball away unnecessarily a couple of times, but helped to force Inkoom back.

The goal came both indirectly and directly because of the changes. Lungu had caused danger down the left and then played a silly backheel to concede possession. But this forced Inkoom into a rare bit of defensive duty, and his limitations there were demonstrated by his poor clearance to Chansa.

Chansa had already moved forward more and started plotting on the edge of the box, and here he played the ball into Mayuka, made a run past him (which would never have happened from a central midfielder before the changes), and Mayuka curled it expertly into the far corner.

The three Zambia players to touch the ball before the goal were Lungu (a sub), Chansa (in a new position after the subs), and Mayuka (a sub).

Conclusion

The bench worked well for Zambia, but in moving back to his XI for the previous game, maybe Renard was simply correcting the errors he made in his starting selection. It will surely be the XI that ended the game that starts the final on Sunday.

Few predicted Ghana’s exit here, but the manner was far from a surprise. Too predictable in the final third and lacking creativity – as discussed late last year, they haven’t yet figured out how to score goals when they’re the side dictating the play.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

747#
发表于 2012-2-9 15:42:47 | 只看该作者
746楼参考译文
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

748#
发表于 2012-2-9 15:50:22 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 pedro 于 2012-2-9 15:53 编辑

Ivory Coast 1-0 Mali: Yaya Toure plays higher and the Ivory Coast play better
February 8, 2012


The starting line-ups

Gervinho’s solo goal sets up a final between the Ivory Coast and Zambia.

Francois Zahoui made a couple of changes to the team that overcame Equatorial Guinea in the previous round. Siaka Tiene, Salomon Kalou and Cheick Tiote all returned.

Alain Giresse made changes to his attackers – both Abdou Traore and Modibo Maiga were dropped, with Samba Sow and Cheik Diabate coming in.

Opening stages

The Ivory Coast dominated the opening stages here, keeping the ball better and getting more men forward than in their previous games, making them much more of an attacking threat, both on the break and when Mali had men behind the ball.

The key to this was Yaya Toure, who was deployed high up the pitch as a number ten – sometimes ahead of Gervinho and Kalou – and in close support of Didier Drogba. Although he often picked the wrong pass in the final third, he provided the link between the midfield and the attack, helping to carry the ball and prevent the Ivory Coast becoming a broken team, as they often are when they play three central midfielders all broadly playing a defensive-minded job.

He was also a goal threat himself – he stormed forward to hit the post from the right of the box. This was the second time the Ivory Coast had hit the woodwork, with Drogba having headed against the post from a Tiene free-kick earlier. As they showed in the previous game, the Ivory Coast are particularly dangerous from dead ball situations, though here they weren’t so reliant on that approach.

The below diagram compares the positions Toure received the ball in this match and the game against Equatorial Guinea in the two first halves (because in the previous game he was pushed higher up the pitch at the break).



Countering

A lot of teams have depended upon counter-attacks in this tournament. Usually, the superior team dominates possession and the weaker side soak up pressure before breaking. Here, however, Mali played the ball very slowly when they won it and their main approach involved gradual build-up play followed by crosses from wide towards Cheick Diabate. The balls into the box were often high and overhit.

It was actually the Ivory Coast who were the bigger threat on the break, and with Gervinho and Kalou they had two players who loved running with the ball. Gervinho struck just before half-time. He’d looked a threat throughout the game, partly because Ousmane Berthe tried to stick very tight to Drogba – he picked up a booking early on – and left space behind him.

Creation

Toure’s involvement has already been covered, but for Mali it was Seydou Keita playing that role. It was notable that he had to keep coming deep to pick up the ball, and therefore wasn’t able to play passes into dangerous zones (although strangely, the pass for Gervinho’s winner was one of Toure’s passes from a deeper position.



It does rather illustrate the difference in creativity between the top sides in Africa and the top sides in Europe – that the two players deployed as creators here were used as much more functional players for Barcelona – Toure as a holder, Keita as an energetic midfield scrapper.

Little change

The problem with the game was that it didn’t really progress tactically. Gieresse took off right-winger Mustapha Yatabare, brought on Gerra Dembele and went to more of a 4-4-2 system, but then Yatabare had been the main player providing crosses, and Mali’s approach looked confused.

The Ivory Coast generally kept their back four and two holders in position and played a very structured game late on. It meant that they were solid and comfortable defensively. Mali were barely a threat, with only one shot on target throughout the game – many were blocked by the Ivory Coast, demonstrating the value of keeping men behind the ball.



Conclusion

Only one real point of interest in an otherwise underwhelming game. Toure played high up the pitch, and the Ivory Coast were a more complete side. They have Zokora and Tiote to sit – Toure must be used as an attacking midfielder to prevent the side becoming compartmentalised instead of cohesive.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

749#
发表于 2012-2-9 15:51:11 | 只看该作者
748楼参考译文
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

750#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-13 12:25:30 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-2-13 12:33 编辑

Manchester United 2-1 Liverpool: United exploit the space around Spearing
February 11, 2012


The starting line-ups

Two goals from Wayne Rooney took Manchester United to the top of the Premier League.

Sir Alex Ferguson moved Ryan Giggs out to the left, bringing in Paul Scholes after his impressive cameo against Chelsea last weekend. Chris Smalling was out, so the defence picked itself.

Despite Craig Bellamy and Andy Carroll enjoying a decent partnership in recent weeks, Kenny Dalglish picked neither and went with Luis Suarez upfront alone. Jose Enrique returned, so Glen Johnson went back to right-back.

The first half was a fairly tame encounter that didn’t have the intensity the atmosphere around the game would have suggested. A stoppage after just 30 seconds (when Rio Ferdinand and Patrice Evra collided) meant the game took a while to get up to full speed and settle into any kind of tempo. When it did, neither side passed the ball particularly well in the centre of midfield, and there was little goalmouth action at either end.

Midfield battle

The game was basically about a fairly slow attritional central midfield battle. The use of Giggs wide on the left meant that United had three passers in midfield (Carrick, Scholes, Giggs), all who like time on the ball to settle and control the game. Dalglish’s use of Jordan Henderson rather than Charlie Adam meant there was more possibility to press United and stop them stamping their authority on the game, but Liverpool were actually quite negative without the ball, sitting deep and letting United play. Early on, United stuggled to transfer the ball from deep positions to the final third, and Liverpool actually enjoyed a decent spell of possession.

But the more the first half went on, the more United took command. Carrick moved higher up and often found himself tracking Steven Gerrard when the Liverpool midfielder moved to the left (he and Henderson often switched places) which opened up space for Scholes to control the game. He had another highly effective performance from deep, spreading the play and setting the tempo of the game.

Spearing problem

Where United really got control was between the lines of midfield and attack. In theory, there was a simple 1 v 1 battle there, between Jay Spearing and Wayne Rooney. But Spearing failed to play this position well, and probably for the first time since he became a semi-regular in Lucas Leiva’a absence, he looked out of his depth.

He wasn’t really sure to what extent he was supposed sto be following Rooney across the pitch. Sometimes he tracked him towards the flank and then had vacated his zone. Sometimes he stayed he stayed in position and Rooney picked up the ball either side of him. But, in fairness, this was as much about a clever United strategy as it was Spearing’s fault – Ryan Giggs played very narrow as a ’second number ten’, in much the same way Park Ji-Sung stayed inside in the recent cup game (below, look how centrally he received the ball compared to Valencia on the right). In addition, Danny Welbeck dropped deep into that zone, and even Scholes moved forward to prompt an excellent flowing move that ended with his own header forcing Pepe Reina into a save.



United’s tactic was basically to get bodies around Spearing and play past him. That is the problem with playing 4-1-4-1 without the ball – the holding player is expected to cover a lot of lateral ground, and there’s the danger that players other than the number ten can move into that space untracked.


When United had the ball, Giggs, Welbeck and Rooney often formed a triangle around Spearing

Giggs was the key player in all this. But – and it’s a big but – it also meant he was in a poor position defensively. He was caught too narrow when Liverpool worked the ball out for Johnson’s left-footed shot that curled narrowly wide. Had that gone in, it would have been fair to attribute it to Giggs’ positioning, so it had benefits and drawbacks.

On the opposite flank, Antonio Valencia again got the better of Jose Enrique. The Spanish left-back didn’t look 100% fit – he turned down plenty of opportunities to get forward and stretch the play, though by staying in position he largely nullified Valencia’s threat later on.

Second half

But this was all about the midfield battle. It was surprising, with United’s dominance late in the first half, that Dalglish didn’t change things and offer Spearing more support by moving Gerrard or Henderson deeper into more of a 4-2-3-1. A double pivot would have provided more security.

Sure enough, United went ahead just after half time. The first goal was from a corner after a good spell of possession, and the second was a symbolic, if not tactically inevitable, illustration of Spearing’s woes – he gave the ball away to Valencia, who slipped in Rooney to score.

2-0

Much of the second half was a static, lifeless contest at 2-0. Ferguson made no substitutions in the entire game despite good options (including Tom Cleverley) to choose from, summarising how happy he was with the shape of his side.

Dalglish made a double change to go 4-4-2. Spearing and Stewart Downing, certainly Liverpool’s worst two players on the day, were sacrificed with Andy Carroll going upfront with Suarez, and Bellamy down the left. Gerrard and Henderson were now the midfield two, and the benefit of a duo there was underlined by the fact United created relatively little at 2-0, and didn’t have such a clear area of dominance in front of the defence.

Final minutes

However, that was partly because they eased off, concentrating upon keeping possession in the midfield and killing the tempo of the game. At one point, they kept the ball for so long in midfield that it prompted ‘olés’ from the crowd at an extremely early stage in the game. The reason for that was because Gerrard and Henderson were sitting so deep, and Suarez and Carroll were playing so high, that there was about 30 yards of space with no Liverpool player in, making it very easy for United to keep the ball there.

Carroll at least provided a different threat to the Evans-Ferdinand partnership that had largely kept Suarez quiet. A set-piece goal got Liverpool back in the game, and United’s relaxed attitude at 2-0 to threatened look like complacency. But they had been right to slow the tempo, and they played by far the better football throughout the game, even without being at their best.

Conclusion

United’s main positive was the way they took charge of the space in and around Spearing, getting bodies around him to form triangles and create danger on the edge of the box. Spearing certainly didn’t have a good game, but then he was clearly outnumbered and needed help from others. The natural understanding of Rooney and Welbeck also helped here, while Giggs’ positioning was vital, even if his passes often went astray.

Liverpool set up very negatively, without either the pace of Bellamy to run at United, or the height of Carroll to cause them problems in the air, as they did at Anfield. David De Gea’s problems may have been overstated in some quarters, but it’s clear that he struggles with high aerial balls, and it’s also obvious that United are not as good at defending set-pieces without Nemanja Vidic. Liverpool’s failure to test United in this fashion was odd (as, going back two weeks, was the decision to stop crowding De Gea at corners when it had already worked once).

Liverpool didn’t improve much after the substitutions – they got back in the game late on, but it wasn’t through any great craft from open play.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|阿根廷风暴 ( 沪ICP备05003678号   

GMT+8, 2025-6-24 12:08 , Processed in 0.187500 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表