[zm欧洲杯德国篇]意2-1德战术分析：巴神梅开二度
本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-6-29 14:37 编辑Germany 1-0 Portugal: Gomez gets the nod upfront, and nods in the only goal
June 10, 2012
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany-portugal.jpg
The starting line-ups
The quietest of Euro 2012’s four games so far ended with a narrow German victory.
Jogi Löw had a few decisions to make – Mario Gomez, rather than Miroslav Klose, started upfront and Mats Hummels was picked over Per Mertesacker in the centre of defence. At right-back, Jerome Boateng played up against Cristiano Ronaldo, despite rumours that Lars Bender would be played out of position there.
There were no surprises in Paulo Bento’s team selection. Miguel Veloso played deep in midfield contrary to reports that Custodio would get a game, and Helder Postiga was the centre-forward.
This was a low-key, cagey match that never seemed likely to produce many goals.
Formation battle
Portugal were 4-3-3 and sat deep in their own half with three relatively defensive-minded midfielders, and rarely looked to break forward other than with the two wingers. Their out-ball was always either to Ronaldo moving inside from the left, or longer balls to Nani down the right. Postiga was rarely involved.
Germany’s shape was the usual 4-2-3-1, with Mesut Özil drifting from side to side, and the two holding midfielders, Bastian Schweinsteiger and Sami Khedira, taking it in turns to go forward. The full-backs stayed relatively deep, probably fearing that they’d leave space in behind for Ronaldo and Nani to break into if they attacked. When Ronaldo did recievethe ball on the run, Boateng stayed narrow and showed him wide.
Midfield battle
The key battle in this game was Özil against Veloso: Özil naturally plays right-of-centre, Veloso naturally plays left-of-centre. Veloso tried to stick tightly to Özil, and although his tracking was generally very good, Özil is just so clever at finding pockets of space in the channels and on the flanks, and his constant lateral drifts were often too good for Veloso. The Portuguese midfielder was reluctant to move a long way from his designated central holding position, for fear that other players would move into that zone and cause problems between the lines.
Özil’s movement is generally lateral anyway, but with Veloso scared outside the width of the penalty box, Özil’s passing chalkboards were the definition of a central winger (nominally playing as a central playmaker, but never actually receiving the ball in the centre of the pitch). Germany struggled to create clear-cut chances, but their best moves in the first half generally came after good work from Özil.
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08D5S.png
Elsewhere in the midfield zone, Meireles and Moutinho tracked the runs of Khedira and Schweinsteiger. As the German duo moved forward in turns and switched from right to left, Meireles and Moutinho were happy to be drawn out of their natural position, as long as their opponents didn’t find space when venturing forward. Khedira and Schweinsteiger didn’t want to over-commit, the Portuguese midfielders were concentrated solely on breaking up play, and so the first half was something of a stand-off.
Portugal chances
Portugal relied on counter-attacks and set-pieces. On breaks, they got the ball to the wingers well, but Ronaldo and Nani couldn’t produce a moment of magic to get into goalscoring positions. From a set-piece, Portugal came very close when Pepe hit the bar following a corner.
Bento’s side will be criticised for playing in a negative manner, but looking at Portugal’s side logically, it’s difficult for Bento to justify playing an attacking game. They have no number ten or a real creative influence to break down a packed defence, and their best bet is relying upon the wingers on the break – that’s the only way Ronaldo and Nani will be able to compensate for the lack of a prolific striker and a creative midfielder.
Germany crosses
Besides, no-one is surprised when sides play this way against Spain – it’s standard practice. Therefore, it’s hardly shocking that teams will play this way against Germany, a side widely considered to be very close to the level of Spain.
The difference, however, is that while Spain are narrow and often lack a traditional number nine, Germany have a prolific central striker in Mario Gomez. With Portugal’s midfield three staying narrow, Germany were sometimes allowed space on the flanks to get crosses in, and although the goal came from a deflected cross and can hardly be attributed to a piece of genius tactical thinking, the mere fact that Germany were happy enough to centre the ball demonstrates one reason why they’re more of an all-round threat than Spain. Gomez had also threatened from a couple of earlier deliveries from wide, then nearly connected with a low centre from Thomas Muller minutes later.
Perhaps Portugal even opened up too much. In the ten minutes before Gomez’s goal they’d become more offensive, playing higher up the pitch, pressing more, getting Joao Moutinho into space between the lines (his pass to Ronaldo looked like it had created the best chance of the game, but Boateng got a superb block in) and pushing Meireles forward to the edge of the box. Germany pounced when Portugal had finally started to play football.
1-0
At 1-0 down, Bento decided to bring on Silvestre Varela for Meireles (Nelson Oliveira had already replaced Postiga upfront) and Portugal went to a loose 4-2-3-1 system, with plenty of movement from the three nominal wingers behind Oliveira. And, with an extra attacking player, Portugal played very good football – there were sharp combinations, movement into channels, an extra dribbler to run at the German defence, and much more urgency in the play. Germany defended well – Hummels in particular – but needed to make some desperate blocks at the back, and Manuel Neuer was also forced into action.
Portugal played ultra-defensive well, and they played all-out-attack well. It was the transition stage that seemed to cost them the game.
Conclusion
This wasn’t a complex match. Portugal started the game playing reactively, Germany were patient in the number of players they pushed forward. Only Özil’s movement, and his battle with Miguel Veloso, provided tactical interest.
Löw’s decision to start with Gomez just about paid off – although he seemed to be preparing Klose just before the switch. Klose still seems a better fit because of his combinations with the other attackers in high-speed moves, but if future opponents are going to park the bus against Germany but give them time in wide positions, Gomez might be the better option. 本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-6-10 15:20 编辑
1楼的参考译文
————————
德国队1-0葡萄牙战术分析：
突前的戈麦斯头球致命一击，打进全场唯一进球——头球，胜利就介么简单
译者：Alex2011
2012-06-10
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany-portugal.jpg
德国队与葡萄牙两队首发阵容：4231 vs 433
到目前为止，2012欧洲杯已经赛完的4场比赛中，最为平淡的一场比赛，以德国队的险胜而告终。
乔吉·勒夫在首发阵容一些位置上作了如下决定：用马里奥·戈麦斯作突前中锋，而没有首选米洛斯拉夫·克洛泽；选择马茨·胡梅尔斯而非赛前预测的佩尔·默特萨克，出任中卫的一个位置。在右后卫位置上，杰罗姆·博阿滕出现赛场上而对位防守克里斯蒂亚诺·罗纳尔多，勿论谣传：拉尔斯·本德将出现在那个位置上。
至于劳尔·本托的首发阵容，则毫不令人惊奇。米盖尔·维洛索出现在后腰位置上，这与库斯托迪奥将得到这个首发位置的之前报道是相反的；而突前中锋则是效力于西甲萨拉戈萨俱乐部的射手埃尔德·波斯蒂加。
这是一场低调的、双方都很谨慎的比赛，似乎不可能产生许多进球的。
阵型的角力
葡萄牙打的是4-3-3阵型，其中三个相对意义上具有防守性质的中场，全都收缩靠后在自己的半场中，而且罕见他们之中有人与两个边翼有配合前突一下的（译者注：若有其中1人那么做了，估计c罗上半场那次带球突到左路禁区外侧后的传中球，就十有八九会转化为进球的）。他们的出球总是这样特点：要么是传给从左向内切的C罗，要么是长传给右路下底的纳尼。波斯蒂加很少被考虑在内的（译者注：杯催）
德国队的阵型还是一如既往的4-2-3-1，其中梅苏特·厄齐尔充作前腰而经常左右换位的，而双后腰巴斯蒂安·施魏因施泰格和萨米·赫迪拉，则采取轮流插上助攻的战术。两个边后卫相对后撤较深，大概是担心：他们若上前攻击则在身后恐怕给C罗和纳尼留下突破的空档。当C罗跑动中再次接到球时，博阿腾的防守只管纵深，不管宽度。
中场的角力
葡萄牙人的机会
德国队的横长传
1-0
结论
本场比赛并非可以称为具有雷霆万钧、波澜壮阔之势场面的比赛。葡萄牙队开场较被动，德国队在若干名球员上前攻击方面则显得很有耐心的。仅有厄齐尔的移动，以及他与米盖尔·维洛索的角力，可以提供战术端的兴趣。
勒夫让戈麦斯首发的决定终究得到了回报 - 尽管在进球前夕他似乎准备用克洛泽上场去替下他的。克洛泽一直似乎具有更好的适合度，尤其是在攻击时的高速运动中他与几名其他攻击手的配合方面，但是如果更多对手欲用“停大巴”防守战术迎战德国队，仅仅在宽度位置上给德国队攻击留有时间余地，那么戈麦斯则是更好的选项。 本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-6-10 13:19 编辑
参考：德国队欧洲杯赛前总前瞻
预测首发阵容
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany.jpg
阵型：4-2-3-1
预测单前锋：戈麦斯还是克洛泽首发
优点：速度、体能充沛和整体阵容强大
弱点：稳固的后防（中卫）组合尚未成型
核心球员：厄齐尔
夺冠赔率：4.35
推荐赔率：3.85（进球最多的队伍）
参见：http://bbs.argstorm.com/viewthread.php?tid=264182&extra=page%3D1
3-4楼 预测德国队首发，与欧洲杯首战的德国队首发，仅仅是中卫一个位置上有变化的
偶想问，格策有木有机会的，例如打荷兰时，或者丹麦时 葡萄牙队首发阵容，与赛前zm预测一模一样的
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/portugal.jpg 德国跟巴西一样，就算没有很大牌的球员的时候，也是其它队伍所不能轻视的；同时我就是觉得葡萄牙很蕃薯。 德国跟巴西一样，就算没有很大牌的球员的时候，也是其它队伍所不能轻视的；同时我就是觉得葡萄牙很蕃薯。
666666 发表于 2012-6-10 15:42 http://bbs.argstorm.com/images/common/back.gif
德国队还是那种1+1大于2的团队型整体战法 对于德国队，预测性总的来说，是比较强的
比赛场上很团结，执行力很强，能爆发出团队能量，即使个人技术不那么受人关注 本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-6-17 16:00 编辑
Germany 2-1 Holland: German flexibility outwits the static Dutch midfield
June 14, 2012
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany-holland.jpg
The starting line-ups
The second excellent Group B game of the night, and another encounter decided by superiority in one particular zone.
Jogi Löw continued with the same starting XI that defeated Portugal on Saturday.
Despite widespread predictions that Holland would change at least one of their front four, Bert van Marwijk’s selection featured only one change, with Ron Vlaar dropping out of the side now Joris Mathijsen was fit to start. Clearly, van Marwijk believed that the majority of Holland’s play against Denmark was good – it was just the finishing that let them down.
Germany were much the better side here – they were more comfortable on the ball, their movement was better and they played at a quicker tempo. It was something of a surprise to see them hanging on towards the end of the game, having been so superior in the first half.
Wide positions
Whereas the earlier Group B game was contested on the flanks, the battles in wide zones here were quiet, with the full-backs coming out on top. Ibrahim Afellay had another disappointing game, and Jerome Boateng again deserves great credit for his defensive performance, having been unsure of his place in the side before the tournament (although he picked up a second yellow card, and will miss the game against Denmark). On the other side, Philipp Lahm played Arjen Robben wonderfully – Robben was predictable, always coming inside onto his left foot, but Lahm had extra knowledge from Bayern, and Robben only succeeded with one of his five attempts to dribble past an opponent.
At the other end, Gregory van der Wiel against Lukas Podolski was something of a no-score draw – it’s difficult to remember either significantly involved in the play – while Thomas Muller was probably the wide player who looked most dangerous (mainly with a couple of crosses towards Mario Gomez) against the inexperienced Jetro Willems – although the Dutch left-back certainly didn’t have a poor game.
Central midfield
This game was all about the midfield, and the contrast between the two systems. Holland were very structured – Nigel de Jong was retained alongside Mark van Bommel, while Wesley Sneijder stayed high up the pitch, more like a second striker than an attacking midfielder. Holland were effectively outnumbered 3 v 2 in the middle, but this wasn’t necessarily a problem if they sat deep, kept their positions, and forced Germany wide.
Holland’s trouble inevitably started from the movement of the fabulous Mesut Ozil, who drifted towards the right of the pitch in the first half, combining with Muller. As the deepest-lying Dutch midfielder, de Jong generally followed him – which left Mark van Bommel covering a large space of the pitch in front of the Dutch defence.
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08Y3R.png
Third runner
Van Bommel then had to pick up the second runner – either Sami Khedira or Bastian Schweinsteiger. But the great value of Germany’s fluidity and bravery in midfield was demonstrated by the fact that the other player didn’t merely stay deep and pick up Sneijder. Germany left him to the centre-backs, generally keeping one full-back in a defensive position to maintain three defenders at the back if the ball was lost. That meant they had a third midfield runner.
The first goal highlighted this brilliantly. De Jong started off marking Ozil in a central zone, but ends up being dragged to a left-back position. Van Bommel tracks Khedira, who also moves towards that side of the pitch. Therefore, the entire central midfield zone has been opened up for Schweinsteiger – with Sneijder miles away. Schweinsteiger gets the ball, and slips in Gomez, who spun and finished excellently. This was an isolated incident, but it had been coming.
For the second goal, something similar happened. De Jong moved with Ozil towards the left-back position and van Bommel had erroneously been tracking Khedira when Schweinsteiger was higher up the pitch. Schweinsteiger was then free to receive Ozil’s pass, and played in Gomez again. In fact, Schweinsteiger only passed to Gomez twice in the first half, and both were assists.
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08vdP.png
Holland changes
Holland had to adjust, and van Marwijk brought on Rafael van der Vaart for van Bommel, which helped Holland connect the midfield and attack. Klaas-Jan Huntelaar replaced Afellay, with the Schalke striker playing upfront as van Persie moved to the flank, switching around with Robben.
Much in the opening game, the change didn’t initially seem to give Holland much extra threat. Their good play in the first half came when van Persie and Robben combined on the right, or when van Persie’s movement (often in behind Mats Hummels, maybe hoping Hummels would be drawn to Sneijder) allowed him a chance after a ball from the centre of the pitch. These combinations were no longer evident, and for the first part of the second half, Germany were comfortable.
Dutch switch
But then, van Marwijk switched van Persie and Sneijder. The former was now a number ten, the latter moving inside from the left. Now, there were some decent moments – although there was still little cohesion from the Dutch front four, and every bit of good play was down to individual moments. Sneijder had a powerful effort blocked by Boateng after Robben beat his man for the first time. Then Sneijder cut inside from the left and shot just wide of the far post. Van Persie, meanwhile, created a goal out of nothing by coming deep to get the ball and firing in from outside of the box. Holland were back in the game, but through individuals rather than the structure of the side.
Germany didn’t defend well in the second half. Compared to at the World Cup two years ago, their shape wasn’t impressive – the second bank of four was slow to form and Holland found space out wide. It was surprising Löw didn’t use his substitutes earlier, to give extra energy to the side, and perhaps some more defensive protection.
But Holland didn’t do enough to merit a point. Their pressing was terrible – the front four or five would close down high up the pitch, then the defence and de Jong would stay on the edge of their own box. Germany played through the first ‘line’ easily, then held the ball, and held on for the win.
Conclusion
This was the perfect demonstration of how a flexible midfield duo can outwit the opposition. Germany were brave, and risked being caught on the break by leaving Sneijder free between the lines, but the alternate forward runs from Schweinsteiger and Khedira confused van Bommel, while de Jong was distracted by Ozil’s usual selfless off-the-ball movement to the flanks.
In more general terms, this was all about cohesion. Germany did everything together – they pressed as a unit, defended as a unit, and broke through with integrated movement and clever passing. Holland relied on individuals, while the defensive shape of the side was poor – quite damning, considering van Marwijk went for the defensive option of two holding midfielders. Germany aren’t mathematically through, Holland aren’t mathematically eliminated, and this was only a one-goal win, but the difference in quality was huge. 本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-6-17 15:46 编辑
9楼参考译文
-------------
德国队2-1荷兰队战术分析：中场斗智斗勇，日耳曼军团的逸动智胜橙色军团的死板
译者：Alex2011
2012-06-17
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany-holland.jpg
双方首发阵容
今天晚上，B组第二场精彩异常的比赛，是由于在特定区域遭遇战中所展现的优势所决定的。
乔吉·勒夫继续沿用周六挫败葡萄牙时首发11人阵容。
无论赛前传言多么广泛，说荷兰队至少要对其前场四人中一个位置上人选作出调整的，但是波特·范马尔维克首发阵容中，仅对后场却不是前场的一处作了调整：他将首场出战的罗恩·弗拉尔放在板凳上，选择伤愈复出的约里斯·马泰森则为这个位置的首发而出战。显而易见，范马尔维克认为首战对阵丹麦队，荷兰队大部分都做得很好 - 仅仅是终结者那一环节的不走运/浪费机会，导致荷兰队得势不得分而遭偷袭失分。
今晚在这个球场上，德国队是表现更好的一方，值得这场强强对话的胜利 - 他们对这场足球比赛的感觉极为舒适自如，他们整体运行更加流畅，他们踢了一场更富有快节奏感的足球比赛。颇为令人惊讶的是，在这场对荷兰队而言为生死大战的比赛中，德国队在上半场就创造出2-0领先的如此较大的优势，这种杀死比赛的气势早早就露出了端倪。
边路位置
中场中路
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08Y3R.png
（中场）第三个接球运行点
那么，范博梅尔不得不去盯防（德国队中场）第二个接球运行点 - 萨米·赫迪拉或者巴斯蒂安·施魏因施泰格。但是，德国队中场的逸动性和冒险性所赋予的巨大价值恰恰被证实了，即其他队员并非仅仅站位靠后而且只盯防斯内德。德国人允许斯内德在中场和后卫之间地带活动，一旦失去丢球，则形成并保持一名边后卫处于盯防、三名后卫坚守后场的防守体系。不言而喻，德国人在中场拥有第三个接球运行点的机动灵活性。
德国队首粒进球，就是这一战术的极其辉煌的闪亮体现。德容首先在中路防守厄齐尔，但是最终却厄齐尔被带到了荷兰队左后卫的位置上，（同时）盯防赫迪拉的范博梅尔，也随赫迪拉向场上这个位置移动。因此，在这一瞬间，中场中路地带就完全向小猪敞开了（一条直通戈麦斯的巨大缝隙）- 当然，斯内德此时已经被甩在后场“数里”之外。小猪接到了皮球，一记神出鬼没的直塞球穿透荷兰人防线直奔禁区里反越位成功的戈麦斯，后者接球后，迅即一个华丽转身摆脱防守队员而打出一记精彩的射门，为德国队首开纪录。虽然，这个首粒进球（貌似）是一个孤立事件，但是（第二粒同样方式的）进球却正在接踵而来之中。
德国队的第二粒进球，其方式和过程与首球颇为相似，德容再次随厄齐尔带球跑动移向他们荷兰队的左后卫的位置上，范博梅尔正错误地忙于盯防赫迪拉，与此同时小猪在场上高速启动高位前插了。无人看管的小猪轻松地得到了厄齐尔的传球，再次直传给戈麦斯。事实上，小猪在上半场仅向戈麦斯传球2次，全都变成了助攻。
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08vdP.png
荷兰队的换人
荷兰队变阵强攻
结论
这是一场经典战例，完美阐释了中场逸动格局（德国队中场二人组，尤指赫迪拉与小猪的双后腰组合）是如何战胜中场僵化布局（荷兰队中场二人组，尤指德容和范博梅尔的双后腰组合）的比赛的。德国队勇敢而富有冒险精神，敢于放任斯内德在其中场和后场两者之间自由活动而将面临着其所带来的攻击威胁，但是赫迪拉和小猪轮番前插攻击，让范博梅尔手忙脚乱、体力不支而处于严重的困扰境地，同时德容则常常被厄齐尔无私的向侧翼无球扯动所分心、所纷扰而纠结迷乱。
就总体而言（在更广泛意义上而言），这全是关乎（球队）凝聚力的层次上诸要素的（而全队配合熟练度是其外在表现）。德国队将每一环节和要素都捏合得非常好 - 他们成建制地前压或者抵御防守，并通过整合有序的推进和机敏传球，迅速突破层层防线制造杀机而打破僵局。荷兰队依靠的是个人而非整体，他们防守阵型颇显窘境 - 这是确之凿凿的，考虑到范马尔维克选择两个防守型中场球员来坐镇枢纽。理论上，德国队还未出线（虽然2战积6分排在B组榜首），荷兰队尚存一线生机（尽管2战1分未得而居于榜尾），而且这一场胜利仅仅是1球小胜，然而，在实质上存在的巨大差异，却并非其表面上的微小量化差距可以比拟的。 拜仁中场脊梁！小猪施魏因施泰格个人集锦
http://player.youku.com/player.php/sid/XNDE2NTY3Mzc2/v.swf 本帖最后由 乔治六世 于 2012-6-22 17:27 编辑
1楼参考译文
------------
来自虎扑足球
德国1-0葡萄牙：厄齐尔灵感四溢，戈麦斯证明自我
2012-06-10
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany-portugal.jpg
双方首发
2012年欧洲杯开赛两天以来最为沉闷的一场比赛结束，德国队1-0小胜葡萄牙。
勒夫在首发阵容中做出了几个选择——戈麦斯代替克洛泽出任单箭头，中卫位置上他以胡梅尔斯换下了默特萨克，右后卫的人选上，虽然之前有流言说拉斯- 本德很可能出现在这个位置上，但最终与C罗对位的还是博阿滕。
葡萄牙的出场阵容则毫不意外，维罗索出任中场拖后的位置，而不是此前媒体报道的库斯托迪奥。波斯蒂加担任中锋首发。
本场比赛的节奏非常缓慢，双方都很小心谨慎，这样的比赛不可能产生太多进球。
阵型之战
葡萄牙的阵型是4-3-3，三名相对而言侧重防守的中场坐镇自己的半场，除了两名边锋之外几乎找不到别的进攻方式。葡萄牙的出球或者是交给C罗从左路内切，或者是长传找到纳尼在右路下底，波斯蒂加很少参与进攻。
德国队的阵型是他们常用的4-2-3-1，厄齐尔坐镇中场串联左右两路，施魏因施泰格和赫迪拉搭档后腰，轮流插上助攻。边后卫的位置相对靠后，可能是为了防止给C罗和纳尼留下太大空间。当C罗拿到球之后冲刺，博阿滕往往占据内线，而把外线留给C罗。
中场之战
这场比赛的关键点在于厄齐尔和维罗索的对峙。厄齐尔的位置是中路靠右，维罗索的位置是中路靠左。维罗索在比赛中尽量紧贴厄齐尔，虽然基本上来讲他的任务完成得不错，但是厄齐尔仍然以他的高球商在葡萄牙的肋部和边路找到空当制造威胁。厄齐尔大面积的游曳使维罗索很难招架，葡萄牙人在是否要跟随厄齐尔跑动的问题上显得十分犹豫，他担心如果被拖离了原本的位置，很可能就会有其他进攻球员趁虚而入，在中场和后卫两条线之间做文章。
厄齐尔的跑动多是横向的，但是有维罗索在禁区前沿的保护，厄齐尔的传球线路放在战术板上来看，更像是一名内边锋（虽然在名义上他是中路的组织核心，但是实际上他几乎从未在中路接到过传球）。德国队在上半时很难创造出绝对机会，但他们最好的几次攻势都是来自厄齐尔的策划。
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08D5S.png
德国队的后腰组合是赫迪拉和施魏因施泰格，葡萄牙队中与他们对位的是梅雷莱斯和穆蒂尼奥。当德国队在向前进攻找不到空当时，两名后腰就会轮流插上以及左右不停换位，如此一来，梅雷莱斯和穆蒂尼奥非常轻易就被带离了位置。赫迪拉和施魏因施泰格在上半时的表现有所保留，葡萄牙中场则只专注于打断德国队的进攻，因此上半时双方的表现势均力敌。
葡萄牙队的机会
葡萄牙队的进攻主要依赖反击和定位球，得球之后，他们能够很好地把球传给C罗和纳尼，但是这两位边锋却找不到射门空档，无法展现自己的魔力。而在定位球上，葡萄牙队距离破门最近的一次机会就是佩佩在一次角球机会中将皮球打在横梁上落地。
本场比赛，本托的球队最让人诟病的一点就是比赛态度很消极，但是客观地审视一下葡萄牙队的人员组成，本托确实很难对他们进行调整来打一场进攻战。葡萄牙阵中没有一名真正的十号球员，也没有能够破密集防守的创造力，因此他们就只能寄希望于边锋的突破，而这也是在球队缺乏高产射手和创造性中场的情况下，C罗和纳尼唯一能做的。
德国队的传中
反观德国队，没有人怀疑他们会用本场比赛的这一套来对付西班牙，打葡萄牙只是一次演习。因此从另一方面来讲，如果有球队也用这种打法来对付德国队，这也毫不奇怪，德国队毕竟是被公认在实力上最接近西班牙的球队。
德国队与西班牙的区别在于，西班牙的阵型更窄，而且缺少一名传统的9号球员，德国队则拥有高产射手戈麦斯。葡萄牙的三名中场站位很窄，因此德国队就能够在两个边路觅得空间下底传中。虽然唯一的一个进球是来自一次斜插，也没有蕴含什么高明的战术思想，但是这个进球本身已经足够领德国人高兴了，它证明了德国队制造的威胁比西班牙队更为全面。戈麦斯本场比赛多次获得边路有威胁的传中，就在进球之后几分钟，穆勒从边路送出的一记低平球差点帮助戈麦斯梅开二度。
葡萄牙队或许给了德国队太大的空间，就在戈麦斯进球前10分钟，葡萄牙大举压上，尝试更多压迫对手。穆蒂尼奥前插至德国队的中场和后卫线之间（他给C罗传出的那一球几乎是葡萄牙队全场最好的一次机会，但博阿滕的阻挡技高一筹），梅雷莱斯的位置也提前到了德国队禁区边沿。当葡萄牙队终于开始踢足球之后，德国队对其一招毙命。
1-0
场上比分变为1-0之后，本托用瓦雷拉换下了梅雷莱斯（此前他用奥利维拉换下了波斯蒂加），葡萄牙队变为一个松散的4-2-3-1阵型。奥利维拉突前，他的身后是三位名义上的边锋。如此一来葡萄牙多了一名进攻球员，他们的表现就有了很大改观。葡萄牙开始有了有威胁的配合，以及对对手肋部的穿插。而且比起之前，他们还多了一位能拿得住球的球员冲击德国队的防线，他们对比赛也有了更多的紧迫感。德国队的防守做得很好，尤其是胡梅尔斯，但他们也多次上演奋不顾身的飞身封堵，诺伊尔也几次做出精彩扑救。
葡萄牙在铁桶死守时表现很好，在全力进攻时表现也很好，看来是两者的过渡阶段浪费了他们太多时间。
结论
这并不是一场复杂的比赛，葡萄牙队的开场很被动，德国队前场有足够多的进攻球员，他们打得很耐心。只有厄齐尔的跑位以及他与维罗索之间的较量，才有拿出来讨论的战术价值。
勒夫使用戈麦斯首发的决定得到了回报，虽然戈麦斯是在勒夫准备用克洛泽换下他之前的那一刻才进了球。克洛泽上场之后与其他攻击球员在高速跑动中的配合告诉人们，他仍然是更适合德国队前场配置的单前锋。但是如果将来的对手都决定对阵德国队时要在门前停大巴，并在两个边路留给他们大量机会，相比较而言戈麦斯可能是更好的首发人选。 本帖最后由 乔治六世 于 2012-6-22 17:37 编辑
9楼参考译文
-----------
来自虎扑足球
德国2-1荷兰战术复盘：机动德军捏爆僵硬橙子
2012-06-14
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany-holland.jpg
首发阵容
B组又一场精彩的比赛，特定区域的完美反击战术决定了最后的结果。
勒夫沿用了第一场对葡萄牙时的首发十一人阵容。
虽然赛前普遍预测荷兰队至少会在首发阵容更换前场四人组中的一人，但是范马尔维克只做了一处调整，那就是马泰森伤愈归队，弗拉尔被换下。很明显，范马尔维克认为荷兰队在对丹麦的比赛中大部分地方表现得都很好，只是临门一脚的准头欠佳才让他们输了比赛。
德国队在这场比赛中表现得更好，他们持球更加舒适自如，跑位更加机敏，比赛的节奏也更快。尤其是德国队在上半时展现出的三下五除二结束比赛的气势令人吃惊。
边路的争夺
B组稍早结束的那场比赛中，双方主要在边路缠斗。而在本场比赛中，边后卫的表现都可以说是顶级的，因此边路并没有制造太大威胁。阿费莱又踢了一场让人失望的比赛，博阿滕的防守工作十分到位，表现出色，很难让人想起他在欧洲杯前还不能百分之百确定主力位置（但是本场领到第二张黄牌之后将缺席对丹麦的比赛）。另一边的拉姆完爆罗本。罗本的球路很好判断，永远都是用左脚内切，拉姆已经非常了解他的俱乐部队友，罗本本场五次尝试过人，只成功了一次。
而在另半边球场，范德维尔和波多尔斯基可以说是打成平手，双方都基本没在比赛中贡献什么令人印象深刻的镜头。相比较而言穆勒是本场最有威胁的边路球员，他在边路多次传中找戈麦斯的落点。防守穆勒的是尚嫌青涩的威廉斯，但是这名荷兰左后卫不能说是踢得不好。
中场中路
这场比赛的攻防大都在中场展开，双方的战术打法可以说截然相反。荷兰队的阵型比较固定，德容与范博梅尔搭档后腰，斯内德站位靠前，与其说是攻击型中场，更像是一名二前锋。荷兰队在中场以二对三，数量上处于劣势，但是如果他们能回收站位，保持住每个人的位置，把德国队压迫至边路，这本来也不成问题。
但是荷兰队的麻烦来自于厄齐尔出色的跑位。他上半时更多靠近右边，与穆勒多做配合。荷兰队中场站位最靠后的德容负责盯防他，这就使得范博梅尔需要独自覆盖后卫身前的巨大空间。
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08Y3R.png
德国队的第三跑动接应点
范博梅尔要去盯防德国队中场另一位负责跑动接应的球员，赫迪拉或者施魏因施泰格。但是德国队在中场的流畅和果敢表现在他们并没有站位很靠后去盯防斯内德，而是放他在中路活动。德国一旦失去球权，一名边后卫会回到防守位置，在后场保持三名后卫的阵型结构。这就意味着他们在中场可以设置带三个跑动接应点。
第一个进球就完全体现了德国队的这一战术。德容跟随厄齐尔进入中路，但是最终却被带到了左后卫的位置，范博梅尔盯防赫迪拉，而赫迪拉也在向厄齐尔的方向移动。这样整个中场就完全向施魏因施泰格敞开，连斯内德也在数米之外。施魏因施泰格得球之后，精准的直塞找到戈麦斯，戈麦斯以一记精彩的射门为德国队首开纪录。这个进球并不是个案，德国队整场比赛中都在坚持这样的打法。
第二个进球的过程极为相似，德容再次被厄齐尔带到左后卫的位置，范博梅尔也在忙着盯防赫迪拉，施魏因施泰格就可以积极地向前插上。施魏因施泰格轻松地得到了厄齐尔的传球，又一次直塞给了戈麦斯。事实上，施魏因施泰格在整个上半场只给戈麦斯传过两次球，两次就都形成了助攻。
http://tf-chalkboards.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/images/08vdP.png
荷兰队主动求变
荷兰队需要调整，范马尔维克用范德法特换下了范博梅尔。这个换人使荷兰队的中场和攻击线有了联系。此外亨特拉尔换下阿费莱，沙尔克前锋突前，范佩西移至边路，另一边依然是罗本。
就像在首场比赛中一样，换人一开始看上去并没有让荷兰队变得更有威胁。他们上半时表现最好的时刻就是范佩西与罗本在右路配合，或者范佩西的跑位（范佩西经常位于胡梅尔斯身后，可能是寄希望于胡梅尔斯能被斯内德拖离位置）让他在接到中场的传球时能够创造机会。荷兰这些球员之间的配合效果并不明显，下半时前半段，德国队依然踢得舒适自如。
荷兰队的调整
但是接下来，范马尔维克改变了范佩西和斯内德的位置。范佩西来到10号位，斯内德则从中路拉向左路。这个调整有了一定效果，虽然荷兰队的前场四人组仍然几乎没有交流，基本上每一次有威胁的进攻都是来自于个人表演。继罗本之后，斯内德也被博阿滕完美冻结。斯内德只能从左路内切，并在边路多尝试远射。范佩西依靠个人能力打进一球，他当时从较深位置得球，在禁区外果断起脚射门。比分变为2-1，荷兰队又看了一丝希望，但是此时他们仍然是更多通过单兵作战而不是集体战术向前进攻。
德国队在下半时的防守表现不能令人满意，尤其是对比两年前的世界杯，他们的发挥很难给人留下深刻印象。四人的后卫线落位布防太慢，在边路给了荷兰队太多次的机会。令人惊奇的是勒夫没有早早换人来为球队增加活力，也没有通过换人为防守增添更多保障。
但是荷兰队的表现还不足以赢回一分，他们对德国队的压迫很无力，前场的四五名球员压得太靠上，而后卫和德容却远远地待在自己的禁区一带。德国队想要通过第一道防线非常容易，他们掌握了球权，一直掌握到一场胜利到手。
结论
这是关于一个灵活的中场组合如何全面压制对手的经典案例。德国队很有勇气，他们敢冒风险放任斯内德在本方的中场与后卫线之间自由活动，但是施魏因施泰格与赫迪拉的轮番前插迷惑了范博梅尔，德容又被厄齐尔无私的无球跑动扯到了边路。
从大处着眼，这场比赛关乎的是球队的凝聚力。德国队依靠整体的力量做到了一切，他们无论是压迫对手，还是后场防御，都是集体作战，再辅以整体的跑位和巧妙的传球制造机会。荷兰队太过依赖个人，范马尔维克同时派上两名防守型后腰，但他们防线的阵型非常糟糕，太过死板。德国队理论上仍有被淘汰的可能，荷兰队理论上也仍有晋级的可能，而且这只是一场一球小胜，但两队表现出来的实力堪称天差地别。 本帖最后由 Alex2011 于 2012-6-23 02:14 编辑
Germany v Greece preview
June 22, 2012
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/gergre.jpg
Potential starting line-ups
On paper, this is the most one-sided of the four quarter-finals. Germany qualified the most impressively of the eight quarter-finalists, while Greece squeezed through with just four points.
Team news
Greek coach Fernando Santos is without two players because of suspension. Giorgos Karagounis is absent from the centre of midfield, while left-back Jose Holebas is also unavailable, though might not have started anyway.
Jogi Löw doesn’t have such problems – in fact, he has Jerome Boateng back after a ban – but reports in today’s German newspapers suggest he’s set to make radical changes in the final third. Most importantly, it seems certain that Miroslav Klose will start instead of Mario Gomez upfront. On the flanks, Andre Schurrle is challenging Lukas Podolski for a starting place, while Marco Reus could play instead of Thomas Muller. It would be a surprise if Löw changed three of his front four, and probably unnecessary considering their 100% record so far.
Greek left / German right and midfield battle
A key area is the Greek left-back zone, the area where they’ve looked vulnerable throughout the tournament. Holebas being out of contention isn’t a significant blow, as Giorgios Tzavelas performed well there against Russia, but he’s likely to be faced with two players – either Muller or Reus, plus Mesut Ozil moving across to that side of the pitch. Tzavelas won’t receive much help from Giorgos Samaras, who will concentrate on marking Boateng, so it’s likely that Grigoris Makos will have to move across the pitch with Ozil.
Makos will worry about leaving the Greek midfield understaffed, and running into the same problems Holland encountered. The German midfield is highly flexible, of course, and though the runs of Sami Khedira and Bastian Schweinsteiger will worry Greece, they should be defending with three central midfielders at all times. Therefore, while the movement and unpredictability could catch them out, they shouldn’t be merely outnumbered, as Holland were.
Santos could format his midfield in two ways – play Kostas Katsouranis high up the pitch with two holders behind, or move Katsouranis deeper and play Giannis Maniatis as the highest midfielder. Maniatis is much more energetic – it’s a question of whether Santos wants that energy used in a purely defensive sense, or in a more ambitious manner.
Elsewhere
Those two battlezones – the Greek left-back area and the centre of midfield – seem the key areas to watch. But there should be some interesting, well-matched battles on the wings. Vasilis Torosidis will take on Podolski or Schurrle in a quick, energetic battle. Higher up the flank, Philipp Lahm will push back Dimitris Salpingidis, though needs to be wary of Salpingidis’ clever movement, both in behind the defence on the break, and into more central positions behind Schweinsteiger.
Boateng against Samaras is essentially a centre-back versus centre-forward battle in a wide zone. Boateng should try and push Samaras towards his own goal, as the Greek forward can be quite effective with his hold-up play in wide positions.
Klose?
But Löw’s apparent decision to play Klose ahead of Gomez will probably be the key feature. Löw is a huge fan of Klose, and many think he would have started this competition upfront were he not an injury doubt, but dropping Gomez after three goals in three games is a huge decision.
It seems that the choice is purely tactical, rather than because of fitness reasons. Klose is a more mobile player with clever movement and would allow Germany to change the positions of their front four more readily (his understanding with Ozil is particularly impressive). That is probably in Löw’s mind, and he wants to outwit the physical Greek centre-back duo with a nippy player, rather than play into their hands with a big striker like Gomez.
However, Löw risks allowing the Greeks to defend deep and narrow. Part of Germany’s brilliance in the group stage was that they had Gomez on the pitch to offer something different, so when Portugal tried to park the bus against them to crowd out the creative players, Germany could use Gomez as a more direct option. Instead, it seems, he’ll be a plan B.
For Greece, there remains a lack of drive going forward, unless Sotiris Ninis gets a surprise start on the right. Greece, predictably, will rely upon set-pieces. 14楼参考译文 德希之战，几无悬念 本帖最后由 pedro 于 2012-6-23 07:49 编辑
Germany 4-2 Greece: near-total dominance
June 22, 2012
http://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/2222222.jpg
The starting line-ups
Germany thrashed a poor Greece side to progress to the semi-finals with ease.
Jogi Low, as widely reported before the game, changed three of his front four. Mesut Ozil remained, but Marco Reus, Andre Schurrle and Miroslav Klose replaced Thomas Muller, Lukas Podolski and Mario Gomez.
Fernando Santos was without Giorgos Karagounis from the centre of midfield, so Grigoris Makis played instead. Sotiris Ninis played on the right, with Dmitri Salpingidis upfront.
Greece tried to soak up pressure, but simply weren’t good enough defensively and Germany constantly created chances.
German approach
The most interesting feature of the first few minutes was the German pressing. They stood off the two Greek centre-backs without the ball, maintaining a good shape near the halfway line. However, as soon as the ball was played into the full-backs, Germany sprung into life and pressed suddenly and ferociously. This approach worked well throughout the game, as Greece struggled to put passes together and launch counter-attacks. The centre-backs weren’t good enough on the ball to distribute it usefully, though Sokratis Papastathopoulos went on a couple of charges forward.
The introduction of Schurrle and Reus made Germany more energetic, quicker and more dynamic with the ball. Reus and Ozil swapped passes nicely and occasionally changed positions, with Reus motoring towards goal purposefully and dangerously. On the other side, Schurrle’s direct play was more obvious when he got the ball, as he cut inside and shot quickly, though this became a little obvious and many of his attempts were blocked.
Greek approach
Greece played this game very cautiously. The back four rarely moved forward, with the full-backs pressed back effectively by Reus and Muller.
The Greek midfield was interesting, however. Kostas Katsouranis played an odd shuttling role – when Greece had the ball (or hit goal-kicks down the pitch towards the forwards) he was the highest midfielder, but when Germany had long spells of possession he often became the deepest of the trio.
But Greece didn’t have any great structure or shape to their midfield in general – Ozil pulled them out of position, while the runs from Sami Khedira often caught them by surprise. Germany simply attacked from so many different angles, and at such great speed, that Greece’s reactive football couldn’t cope – they were trying to react to so many different things. Ninis should have defended better for Philipp Lahm’s goal, but this came at the end of constant pressure, and Germany should have been ahead before having worked their way into the penalty box repeatedly.
Second half
If there’s one thing Santos has done well in this tournament, it’s been half-time changes (although the inevitable question is why he can’t get things right from the start). Here, he brought on Theo Gekas upfront with Salpingidis moving to the right to the right. Central midfielder Georgios Fotakis replaced left-back Giorgos Tzavelas due to injury, with Maniatis going to right-back, and Vasilis Torosidis switching sides.
Germany seemed to drop the tempo after half-time, almost as if they were planning on keeping it 1-0. However, while it’s difficult to say that the Greek goal was coming, or that they merited it on the balance of play, they had put together a decent break before the goal, when Gekas and Samaras combined.
The goal came when Salpingidis, now on his natural position on the right flank, got the ballto feet and was in a position to run with it, something that never happened in the first half. He crossed for Samaras to tap in. However, it was more interesting that the goal came from a loose Schurrle pass – it wasn’t his first, and he was later the first German player to be removed. His sloppy passing might prevent him from starting the semi-final.
Germany run away with it
Greece angered Germany too early, though, and Low’s side stepped up the tempo and ended up winning the game at a canter. The second goal, from Khedira, demonstrated his ability to time runs into the both excellently from deep positions – something he’s done well throughout the tournament, probably outperforming the more established Schweinsteiger in the centre of the German midfield.
From then on, Ozil took over to turn in his finest performance of the tournament so far (though his poor finishing is often remarkable for such a good player). He provided the assist for Klose’s headed third from a free-kick he’d won himself out on the right, then was the man who provided the run shortly before Reus’ thumped fourth.
Greece eventually got a second to make the scoreline closer than it should have been, but really this was a mismatch and uninteresting tactically, aside from the different qualities the ‘new’ German attackers provided.
Conclusion
Germany were – put simply – too good. The changes Low made broadly worked well, giving a quicker feel to the German side, a good move against a slow, cumbersome Greek back four. Klose scored a fine header, but more importantly his movement and link-up play made Germany more fluid as a whole. With a more intelligent centre-forward and two more direct wingers, Ozil was the main man to benefit – and he played a part in all four goals. If Germany can get him constantly involved, they stand a great chance of winning Euro 2012.
Greece’s approach relied upon good penalty box defending, but too often they were sliced open easily. Their old weakness, a poor goalkeeper, was also obvious at various points. But Santos did well to get out of the group in the first place, and his approach tonight was probably the right one on paper. Ultimately, there’s no shame in losing heavily to a vastly superior side. 本帖最后由 pedro 于 2012-6-23 14:09 编辑
17楼参考文
----------
来自虎扑足球
德国4-2希腊：一场几近完美的统治级比赛
2012-06-23
http://i1.hoopchina.com.cn/blogfile/201206/23/13404107567158.jpg
双方首发阵容
德国队血洗孱弱希腊，轻松杀进欧洲杯四强。
勒夫正像赛前媒体广泛爆料的那样，前场四人组他更换了三名首发，只有厄齐尔保持不变。罗伊斯、许尔勒和克洛泽分别换下了穆勒、波多尔斯基和戈麦斯。
希腊队的中场卡拉古尼斯停赛，马科斯顶替他首发。尼尼斯担纲右路，萨尔平吉迪斯突前。
希腊队尝试化解德国队的强大压力，但他们的防守能力有限，无力阻挡德国队连续创造出的得分机会。
德国队的战术
比赛开始的前几分钟之内，最让人感兴趣的是德国队的压制。无球时，他们远离两名希腊中卫，在中线附近保持着完整的阵型；而一旦从两名边后卫脚下得球，德国队就会出其不意地制造犀利的攻势，这一招在整场比赛中屡试不爽。希腊队的传球和反击都很难打得起来，两名中卫持球能力不够，难以为球队提供支持，虽然帕帕斯塔索普洛斯有过几次插上。
许尔勒和罗伊斯的首发出场令德国队更有活力和速度，效率也更高。罗伊斯和厄齐尔之间的传球和换位非常灵活，罗伊斯的射门也很有威胁。另一边的许尔勒在得球之后更加直接，通常都是迅速内切，完成射门。但是他的这一套路过于明显，因此不少机会都被对手封堵。
希腊队的战术
希腊队在比赛中非常小心，他们的四名后卫很少上前，边后卫的助攻也被罗伊斯和许尔勒有效地压制。
而希腊队的中场很有意思，卡楚拉尼斯在中场来回穿梭，当希腊队得球（或大脚向前开球门球）时，卡楚拉尼斯是站位最靠前的一名中场球员；而当德国队控球时，他通常又拖在最后面。
但是总的来讲，希腊队谈不上有什么太好的阵型，厄齐尔和赫迪拉的跑位把他们带离了原本的位置。德国队的进攻迅速且多点开花，希腊虽有心但无力，难以招架德国队的攻势。尼尼斯在拉姆的那个进球中本应防守得更好一些，但这也是德国队连续不断制造压力所带来的结果，他们反复以各种方式进入禁区，本来早就可以取得领先。
下半时
如果说桑托斯在这届欧洲杯里有一件事做得很出色，那就是他在本场比赛中场时的调整（虽然一个很明显的问题是他为什么不能从一开始就把事情做好）。他换上耶卡斯突前，而把萨尔平吉迪斯拉到右路。中场球员福塔基斯换下了受伤的左后卫萨维拉斯，马尼亚蒂斯担任右后卫，托罗西迪斯换边到左后卫。
德国队在下半时有意放慢节奏，似乎想要将1-0的比分保持到终场。然而很难讲希腊队的进球是顺理成章，还是他们打破比赛平衡得到的奖赏。耶卡斯和萨马拉斯在进球前就有过配合，制造了一次不错的机会。
希腊队的进球是源于萨尔平吉迪斯在下半时回到了他熟悉的右路，因此他获得了更多的触球机会，也有空间能够跑动，这在上半时可是完全看不到的。萨尔平吉迪斯传中，萨马拉斯进球。有意思的是这个进球是来自于许尔勒一次漫不经心的传球失误，而这不是他在本场比赛中第一次出现失误，后来他是德国队第一名被换下的球员，草率的传球可能会葬送他在半决赛的首发位置。
http://i2.hoopchina.com.cn/blogfile/201206/23/134041076763403.png
德国队及时应对
但希腊过早地惹怒了德国队。勒夫的球队马上加快了比赛节奏，将比赛变为一场大胜。赫迪拉的进球完美展现了自己掌握时机从本方腹地冲入对方禁区的能力，而他在本届欧洲杯上表现出色的原因之一也是因为施魏因施泰格更加稳定地掌控了德国队的中场。
而从这个进球之后，厄齐尔接管了比赛，打出了本届欧洲杯迄今为止他最好的表现（虽然对于这样一位出色的球员来说，他糟糕的进球能力更为扎眼）。厄齐尔在右路主罚他自己制造的任意球，助攻克洛泽头球为德国队打进第三球，然后又策划了罗伊斯打进的第四球。
http://i2.hoopchina.com.cn/blogfile/201206/23/134041077882871.png
希腊队在比赛临近结束时打进第二球，但两队场上表现的差距并不像最终比分所表现得那样小。本场比赛双方实力相差悬殊，在战术上没有太多探讨价值。但“新一代”德国攻击手的水准令人眼前一亮。
结论
简单地说，德国队太棒。勒夫针对比赛做出的人员调整收到了良好的效果，针对缓慢笨拙的希腊队四名后卫，德国队速度快，跑位巧妙。克洛泽的头球很精彩，但他更重要的价值是以跑位和串联让德国队整体更加流畅。一位更聪明的中锋，两个更直接的边锋，从中得益的是厄齐尔，厄齐尔参与了德国队所有的四个进球。如果他能够继续像今天这样表现，德国队将有很大机会夺得欧洲杯冠军。
希腊队的战术依赖于出色的禁区防守，但他们太容易被扯开。门将太弱是希腊队的老问题，在这场比赛中再次暴露无遗。但是桑托斯能将希腊队带到小组出线已经是很不错的成绩，而且他本场比赛的战术在纸面上也是正确的。最终大比分输给一支各方面都强他们太多的球队，希腊队无需为此感到羞耻。 4-2比分，说明希腊队虽在实力强大德国队目前难逃厄运，但是还能在第55分钟扳平比分，介个队伍抗击打能力以及不甘屠戮的精神，值得世人尊敬 http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/61091000/jpg/_61091537_head-to-head-rankings-ger-gre.jpg http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/61091000/jpg/_61091536_player-comparison-sch-ozil.jpg 欧足联官方网公布的统计数字
比分： 4 - 2
控球率： 66% - 34%
射门： 24 - 9
射正： 14 - 5
角球： 10 - 1
越位： 5 - 2
黄牌： 0 - 2
犯规：9 - 10
受侵犯： 10 - 7 捷克和希腊相继出局，表明本届欧洲杯再无黑马角色 德国后防还是有点渣~ 介个帖子能否存活到决赛？
偶看行
页:
[1]
2