[科比案] 已有证据显示女方说谎?!
(一)http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5070072/
MSNBC星期三的报导，根据与案情密切的人士透露，已有科学证据可证明，女方在事发后不久，便与其他男子发生性行为。这个发现显然与女方当初的证词不符，即她有明显的说谎之嫌。
证据显示，在经过检验之后，女方的身体内发现了新的精子与精液，这将可做为她在案发后数小时内与其它男子发生性行为的证明。
女方律师当初严词否认辩方律师的这项指控。
(二)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,121041,00.html
Fox news的报导，检察官方面表示，女方在事发后短时间内并未与其他男子发生性行为，他们指出这个科学检验是有问题的，将寻求其他的实验室进行检验。(WHAT A JOKE)
检察官胡伯特说：“与他人发生性行为并不表示她那晚没有被强暴。”
(三)
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/US/Kobe_Bryant_DNA_040526-1.html
根据abc的报导，辩护方律师将在下一次庭审时，向法官诉请重新检验2名与原告有过关系男子的DNA检体。
其中之一，也就是该间旅馆的BELLMAN，Pietrack，已接受重新接受检验的要求，他说他没有什么好隐瞒的。但另一个关键的男子herr，则是到目前为止还未同意。
根据指出，女方承认在与科比发生性行为的前两天，曾与Pietrack发生过关系，而Herr与她则是在事发前两周有接触。
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-1 8:07:54编辑过]
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1810798
昨天的DNA检验报告出炉以后，KOBE的律师在今天开庭时就针对这一点做发挥，他们要求采集到的证据和两个与女方有关系的男子DNA进行比对。这两个男子分别是旅馆服务员Bob Pietrack和原告的前男友Matt Herr。
辩方律师之一的Hal Haddon表示，Bob已经表示愿意接受DNA检验，但后者的律师则是拒绝了这个要求，他认为，这损害到个人受宪法保障的权利。
“不管我的客户有没有跟被害人发生性关系，那都不重要，”Matt Herr的律师说，“他的dna检体并不助于厘清这个案情。”
法官对此还未做出决定。
×××
原告女子过去的性史将可能成为案子的关键，如果法官最后裁定这个部分可以在审判时做为呈堂证供。辩方律师称，女方身上所留下的伤痕可能是她在6月30日事发前后，与其它男子发生性行为时所造成的。
×××
虽然女方说在事发后短时间内并未与他人发生性关系，但调查结果显示，在女方体内、与当时受检的两条内裤上所发现的 新的精子与精液，皆与布莱恩特的基因不符合。其中一件内裤为女方事发当晚所着，另一件为隔日到医院接受检查时所着。
下次庭审的时间预计是6月21到6月25日。
呵呵~~我开始怀疑KOBE是被强暴的了~~~~ 以下是引用wto在2004-6-1 20:24:00的发言：
呵呵~~我开始怀疑KOBE是被强暴的了~~~~
强暴一个接近2米的NBA黑人球员，这个好像难度太大了吧 是不可能！强奸犯就是那个黑大个~~~~ 这有什么不可能的, 一切皆有可能!!(后面那句不说了)
原告方要求传新证人
Kobe案原告方最近通知Kobe律师团，他们将要求一位22岁的佛罗里达州女招待出庭作证。这位女招待声称，2002年感恩节Kobe在Shaq家的派对上试图强迫与她发生性关系。据她说，那天Kobe要了她的手机号码，并要求她送一杯饮料到户外，但她端来饮料时，Kobe当着另一个男人的面摸了她的私处，被推开后，Kobe大笑不止。第二天，这名女招待接到一个男人的电话，说Kobe对昨天的事表示歉意。鹰郡检察官说该女子在得知Kobe被起诉后主动联系了法庭，报告了以上事件。据说Shaq已经意识到自己可能作为证人出庭，正在为此准备。
PS，新浪的标题是“科比强奸奥尼尔家女佣”，汗死 真是小题大做啊~~胖胖你可不能落井下石啊~~ 干脆把家女佣3个字去了``` 那个女的……汗~
科比没事了？
Kobe案有重大进展！好象原告方申请将审判日期无限期延后并改到民事法庭起诉Kobe，要求经济赔偿（7万5千美元 – 73万美元）。
一谈钱就好办事，估计会庭外和解。
反正Kobe胜算在握，牢狱之灾看来是免了。 哎，可怜的KB哦，以后可别再被人诱惑后再被人家反咬一口咯。
Kobe案原告提出撤销指控
Kobe Bryant's legal drama may soon be over.
ABC News is reporting Wednesday afternoon that the prosecution in the Bryant case will ask the judge later in the day to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning the case cannot ever be brought back for trial. According to the report, the accuser has told prosecutors she is no longer willing to testify.
Prosecution spokeswoman Krista Flannigan said a news conference has been scheduled for 7 p.m. ET with Eagle County district attorney Mark Hurlbert.
NBC News was reporting that the request for dismissal would be without prejudice, meaning a future trial would be possible. ESPN legal analyst Roger Cossack, however, told ESPNews that it would be unlikely for a judge to grant that request after more than a year of pre-trial hearings and the start of jury selection.
Even if the criminal charges are dropped, Bryant still faces a civil suit that was filed by his accuser earlier this summer.
The news of the case's possible end comes on the heels of Bryant's defense attorneys filing for dismissal earlier Wednesday, saying prosecutors have refused to turn over details that could suggest he is innocent.
Court rules require prosecutors and defense attorneys to exchange evidence and witness opinions before trial, a process called discovery.
In a motion made public Wednesday, defense attorneys said a forensics expert whom prosecutors had planned to call as a witness had information that "undermined the accuser's allegations and the prosecution's case, and corroborated Mr. Bryant's defense on a central issue -- the cause and significance of the accuser's alleged injuries."
The filing said those opinions were not disclosed to the defense until they contacted the expert Friday, despite repeated requests to prosecutors for the information.
"A person's life and liberty are at stake," the defense attorneys wrote. "The game of hide-the-ball, find-it-if-you-can discovery is intolerable. This court must vindicate Mr. Bryant's constitutional rights and impose meaningful sanctions against the prosecution."
Prosecutors have said they have turned over all information they were required to.
页:
[1]